Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote > Hi Francesco, > > I don't see why the merges for SYNCOPE-203 need to be reverted as they are > not breaking anything. I would prefer to leave things as they are but not > claim full OSGi support in the 1.1.0 release. > > I guess you are concerned that these issues will hold up the 1.1.0 release > and so I propose the following. Give us until the end of the week to find > a > solution for SYNCOPE-337 (and any related problems). If we have not found > a > solution by then, then this JIRA can be moved to the next release (1.1.1 > if > it can be considered a "bug" based on 1.1.0, otherwise 1.2). > > Does this work?
Hi Colm, is there any progress about this? I think we should be able to at least think starting the 1.1.0 release process this week, hence understanding how to handle the OSGi features is quite important right now. Regards. -- View this message in context: http://syncope-dev.1063484.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Move-full-OSGi-support-to-1-2-0-tp5713275p5713409.html Sent from the syncope-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
