On 04/06/14 12:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 04/06/2014 13:09, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that the REST API for 1.2 exposes the CXF-based
REST service under "/rest", and that the old API previously available
under
"/rest" is removed?
Correct.
I think it would probably be a good idea to redirect "/cxf" queries to
"/rest" so as not to break REST-based 1.1 clients, WDYT?
I don't see any problem with this redirect - I am actually wondering how
to implement it - but AFAIR there are some differences between CXF 1.1
and 1.2 APIs.
The simplest option is to have a "/cxf" method that will call if it is
at all possible in a given case on "/rest" handler.
Or have PreMatching ContainerRequestFilter that will change the request
URI if it ends with "/cxf".
Client side redirect with Request.seeOther is also possible.
Cheers, Sergey
Regards.
