On 24/10/2014 10:50, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Yup, I'll do it.
Thanks Colm!
FYI,
* trunk was removed in http://svn.apache.org/r1634032
* branches was removed in http://svn.apache.org/r1634033
Regards.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi all,
it seems that this discussion has not got particular feedback - but not
even raised any concern; I am then about to act as proposed, e.g. remove
from SVN /branches and /trunk and to leave /tags (and the rest) as is.
I'll let you know when done.
There will be likely the need to review our wiki in order to find
references to /trunk or /branches and to change into links to
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=syncope.git
Any volunteer?
Regards.
On 22/10/2014 15:47, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Seems reasonable to me.
Colm.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
if you read comments in INFRA-8435, you will notice that it seems that
INFRA cannot easily make, for our SVN repository, the paths /trunk /tags
/branches read-only while keeping the rest read-write - which was my
initial request.
Given that, and considering that we are currently managing our website
via
svnpubsub at /site, I've received the proposal to remove /trunk /tags
/branches from our SVN repository - now that we have our new GIT
repository
fully operational.
The only issue I can see with this is for our wiki pages which often
reference SVN paths, with special reference to /tags in release notes and
upgrade procedures.
Before taking any action, I thought it was worth to briefly have a
discussion about this: I'm proposing to remove /branches and /trunk and
to
leave /tags as is (for the reason expressed above).
WDYT?
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
