Here are some reasons for moving as outlined by Dan: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Gitbox-tp5782125p5782244.html
I guess if we are not seeing many github PRs then there is not a huge incentive to change over. However, it's a fairly trivial change to make. I don't have strong view either way, just thought I'd mention it! Colm. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò < [email protected]> wrote: > On 13/09/2017 10:22, Andrea Patricelli wrote: > >> Hi Colm, >> >> Il 12/09/2017 13:40, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Other git-based projects at Apache, such as Apache CXF, have moved to use >>> gitbox.apache.org. The main advantage is that the source is >>> automatically >>> synced with github, and hence we can push commits directly to github, >>> thus >>> making merging PRs a lot easier. >>> >>> IMO we should also migrate...any thoughts? >>> >> +1, it sounds very good to me! >> While (quickly) googling I did not found so much info on Gitbox, only >> references to a gitboxapp [1] for Mac (not sure that it is relevant). >> Why there is so scarce documentation? >> > > It's https://gitbox.apache.org/ > > I'm actually +-0 for this: I don't see much benefits (we've been handling > PRs without much troubles so far) nor big problems. > > Regards. > > [1] http://www.gitboxapp.com/ >> > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
