Hi All, As we are nearing the release, I am starting to focus on the release notes. Notes for SystemDS 2.0 release should consolidate all the things that happened since Aug 2018 (last SystemML release). While I will aggregate the notes from two SystemDS releases, it will be great if you can update me with a few lines summarizing the additions to your features (including the external contributions), especially after March 24, 2020 (last SystemDS release).
Once ready, I will share for everyone to have a look. Regards, Arnab.. On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:34 PM Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> wrote: > thanks Arnab for looking over the remaining open issues. Together with > Shafaq, we just came across two additional bugs related to eval function > calls. Theses fixes should go into the RC and I intend to fix them as > soon as possible. > > Regards, > Matthias > > On 8/27/2020 8:41 PM, arnab phani wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Currently, I see only a few issues are flagged for 2.0 release. Can you > > please go through your open issues and check if the Fix-Version is set? > > Also, if a JIRA task doesn't exist for something you are working on or > want > > to have in the coming release, please open a task and flag it for 2.0. > > > > Regards, > > Arnab.. > > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:18 PM Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> as the target release date end of August comes closer, I'd like to share > >> that Arnab Phani kindly volunteered in an offline discussion to act as > >> the release manager for our 2.0 release. > >> > >> Please, flag issues and features you think are important for the 2.0 > >> release as such in JIRA so we can monitor them, discuss them on a case > >> by case basis, and push the release date if necessary. Thanks. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Matthias > >> > >> On 8/17/2020 2:51 PM, Janardhan wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> The following is the status of the MLContext test for algorithms. > >>> > >>> 1. l2svm, msvm, PCA - scripts are running + results are not equal to R > >>> 2. Autoencoder, StepwiseReg - Scripts are not running > >>> 3. KMeans, GLM (need to fix R) - No R script > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Janardhan > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:29 AM Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> thanks for the perspective, I think we should be very pragmatic > >>>> regarding languages. Let's stick to DML as our domain-specific > language > >>>> with R-like syntax, but add language bindings such as the Python API > >>>> (and others) to seamlessly plug into common data science workflows. A > >>>> similar mind set worked very well in the internals too: Java for > nicely > >>>> integrating with Hadoop/Spark and simplicity, but with C++ and CUDA > >>>> kernels and native libraries where necessary. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Matthias > >>>> > >>>> On 7/9/2020 3:54 PM, Janardhan wrote: > >>>>> DML - %*% seems more Intuitive compared to @. Let us not change the > >>>> syntax > >>>>> ( our selling point easy porting to R! ) > >>>>> Python - no solid opinion > >>>>> > >>>>> - Janardhan > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 19:06 Matthias Boehm, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> for the Python API this is fine, for DML not as we should stick as > >> close > >>>>>> as possible to R syntax. Once we had a pydml syntax too, but this > >>>>>> created lots of inconsistencies and could not use Python as a host > >>>>>> language. So, I think restricting such changes to the Python API is > a > >>>>>> good path forward. Other opinions? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Matthias > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 7/9/2020 3:31 PM, Baunsgaard, Sebastian wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi all > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Can i suggest a radical change of matrix multiply. > >>>>>>> to change the command from %*% to @. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Python has made this commitment! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> or at least change this in the python API? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best regards > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sebastian > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>>> From: Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 11:04:12 PM > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache SystemDS 2.0 Release > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd like to propose Aug 31 as a target date for the SystemDS 2.0 > >>>> release > >>>>>>> (feature freeze August 21). This should gives us enough time to > >> figure > >>>>>>> out the list of things that still should go into this release as > it's > >>>> an > >>>>>>> opportunity of a major for changes of external behavior. However, > as > >>>>>>> it's the first SystemDS Apache release, I think we should still > stick > >>>> to > >>>>>>> Spark 2.x and Java 8 and consider upgrades of Spark and the JDK for > >>>>>>> subsequent releases. So, what do you think and any major features > >> you'd > >>>>>>> like to see complete for 2.0? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Matthias > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
