On 08/02/2021 18:28, Matthias Boehm wrote:
> great thanks for the perspectives.
> 
> ad 1) renaming master to main is a fine proposal for more inclusive
> naming. Let's separate it from the release discussion though as its
> purely related to our infrastructure.

Yes, sorry for hijacking this thread. A separate discussion is a good
proposal. +1

> 
> ad 2) for the post-2.1 release we can also discuss directly going to
> SystemDS 3.0 to indicate this change of external behavior, and align
> with the hadoop and spark versions.
> 

+1

> ad 3) do we have any volunteers for taking over the responsibility of
> the release manager for SystemDS 2.1?
> 

I will volunteer for this honor again at a later date ;-)

> Regards,
> Matthias
> 

Best regards,
Mark

> On 2/8/2021 3:59 PM, Mark Dokter wrote:
>> On 08/02/2021 15:45, arnab phani wrote:
>>> +1
>>> I think the best order will be first to move to Java 11, make the
>>> system stable, and then switch to Spark 3.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> If Spark 2.x works with Java 11 (I didn't check), then this sounds like
>> a good plan. Otherwise it's all at once :-P
>>
>> While we're at breaking changes: I heard master branch renames are quite
>> fashionable these days (e.g., master -> main).
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Arnab..
>>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 3:38 PM Baunsgaard, Sebastian
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only question is in what order to upgrade or all at once?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Matthias Boehm <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 1:21:55 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: SystemDS 2.1 (Spark 2.x and Java 8)
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Spark 3 is out since June 2020, and we see an increasing move from Java
>>>> 8 to Java 11. I think it would be good to have one last release before
>>>> we make these backwards-incompatible changes though. What do you think
>>>> about releasing SystemDS 2.1 around end of March and then making the
>>>> switch to Spark 3 (and Hadoop 3), and Java 11?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to