Baunsgaard commented on PR #1847: URL: https://github.com/apache/systemds/pull/1847#issuecomment-1599926017
> 1. I am in favour of simplicity if it is clean and simple fine with me. Otherwise i am also fine with standard time calls in python. We have to remember what the use case is and in this case the difference in python garbage collector should not be a factor we need to consider. 2. I suggest that we keep to the lazy interface and do not add some new shortcut. Since again we have to keep in mind what is the usecase. And in this case it is a user script. They care about the entire thing with compiling and sending over the python script to java. Not only the data transfer. I understand this make it more inconclusive about where time is spend. But if the data is of appropriate size then the overheads not associated with IO is amortized and will no longer be much visible in the observed times that we want to measure. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@systemds.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
