+1 for consistency especially before 1.0 release. Thanks
Niketan > On Sep 16, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > +1 for 'sysml'. > > Thanks, > Glenn > > Matthias Boehm ---09/16/2017 04:34:46 PM---Currently, our SystemML > configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix scheme. For example, som > > From: Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> > To: dev@systemml.apache.org > Date: 09/16/2017 04:34 PM > Subject: Consistency SystemML configuration properties > > > > > Currently, our SystemML configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix > scheme. For example, some properties use the prefix 'dml' (e.g., > dml.yarn.appmaster), others 'systemml' (e.g., systemml.stats.finegrained), > and yet others no prefix at all (e.g., localtmpdir). > > We discussed this before but we never actually made the change. I would > prefer the prefix 'sysml' for consistency with our package names. Are there > any other preferences? If not, I'll make this change end of next week. > > Regards, > Matthias > > >
