+1 for *sysml* name On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Deron Eriksson <[email protected]> wrote:
> With regards to package refactoring, I think short package names are great, > unless there is an Apache expectation for the full project name to be in > the package. Luciano, are you aware any standards in regards to this? I > would highly favor org.apache.sysml over org.apache.dml, since (1) sysml > reflects the project name, and (2) DML has very strongly entrenched meaning > in the database world. > > Deron > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > first week of December for our 0.8.1 release sounds good to me. > > > > Apart from bug fixes and performance features, the focus should be mostly > > on increasing robustness of our spark backend. Since 0.8.0, we already > > added important features like "partitioned broadcasts" (in order to > > overcome the 2GB broadcast limitation) and "improved guarded collect" (to > > overcome OOM situations on RDD collect). There are still some open issues > > w/ regard to (1) potential OOMs, (2) repeated lazy evaluation of common > > subexpressions, and (3) data converter utils for external formats. > > Resolving these known issues would be a nice cut for this minor release. > > > > Regarding the package refactoring, I agree that we should do this right > > away; I would, however, prefer a short package name such as > > 'org.apache.dml' or 'org.apache.sysml'. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 > > AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, t]Deron > > Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an > Apache > > Incubator project, the packages need to be > > > > From: Deron Eriksson <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Date: 11/20/2015 11:09 AM > > Subject: Re: Next SystemML Release > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, the packages need to be > > updated, right? (com.ibm.bi.dml.* to org.apache.systemml.*) Since the > > project just moved to its new repo, it would probably be a good time to > > make this update since this would minimize impact on developers. This > > affects all Java files in the project. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Deron > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Shirish Tatikonda < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Luciano, > > > > > > First week of December sounds good. That should give sufficient time to > > fix > > > a few known issues. > > > > > > Shirish > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to get our first official Apache release soon, which > will > > > > incorporate minor bug fixes and anything else post our 0.8.0 release. > > > Any > > > > other big enhancement we should target for this release ? > > > > > > > > How about targeting to cut a release in the first week of December ? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
