Hi, I believe the js and css issues have been addressed (see src/assembly/source/LICENSE) for the src packages. The standalone license also features the js/css licenses but I believe this is not necessary because the documentation is currently not packaged into any artifact except the src distributions.
The antlr-generated src/main/java/org/apache/sysml/parser/*.java files now have Apache headers so they should be fine. The Zeppelin tar.gz example has been replaced by a json file, so that has also been addressed. I believe there are some remaining license/notice/disclaimer issues for the build artifacts that we generate. Please see SYSTEMML-659, -660, -661, -662, -663, -664, -665, and -667. Perhaps a license expert (such as Luciano) can look at these and close any that are not issues? Note that our large number of distribution artifacts (11!) makes it quite difficult to track these down. Perhaps someone can look into Justin's points [4] and [8] and verify that everything is correct? Deron On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:39 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > This sounds good to me, and those of us at IBM agreed during a recent > meeting that we are okay with this approach if the community is. Deron > noted that there are a few licensing issues left over from last time, a few > of which relate to specific existing algorithms that may have been pulled > from a textbook. He sent out an email to the dev list a few days ago > ("Fwd: [Vote] Apache SystemML 0.9.0....."), but no responses yet. > > Deron also opened several JIRAs with the remaining tasks. We don't want > to block any other work though with creating a release. > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On May 6, 2016, at 1:52 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I will be presenting SystemML next week at ApacheCon and would be great > if > > we could have a release available or in progress. > > > > I know there was some initial discussion around a 0.9.1 release, but how > > about starting a 0.10.0 release out of trunk ? > > > > If nobody objects to it, I can volunteer to be the RM for the release. > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
