+1, but please note following findings:

1. Is the *source-release.zip artifact unnecessary, since we have
src.tar.gz and src.zip artifacts? Also, it contains the Hadoop binaries.
So, it can't be used as the "source release" artifact.
2. No standalone uberjar is present (I am happy with this since no one to
my knowledge is using it and the LICENSE/NOTICE may need updating. I would
like to remove this artifact forever.)
3. No in-memory jar is present (I am happy with this too since this
artifact is not very lightweight as it was probably initially meant to be.)

Deron





On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Frederick R Reiss <frre...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
>  Sent from my iPhone using IBM Verse
>
>  On Jun 1, 2016, 9:31:36 AM, reinw...@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
>  From: reinw...@us.ibm.com
>  To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>  Cc:
>  Date: Jun 1, 2016 9:31:36 AM
>  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)
>
>
>    +1
>   Regards,
>   Berthold Reinwald
>   IBM Almaden Research Center
>   office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
>   e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com
>   From:   Shirish Tatikonda
>   To:     dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>   Date:   06/01/2016 12:47 AM
>   Subject:        Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)
>   +1
>   On Jun 1, 2016 12:40 AM, "Matthias Boehm"  wrote:
>   > +1, but if there is a third rc, let us please create a branch or cut
> the
>   > release as of today to ensure no new features are leaking in.
>   >
>   > Regards,
>   > Matthias
>   >
>   > [image: Inactive hide details for Luciano Resende ---05/31/2016
> 10:05:48
>   > PM---Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apach]Luciano
>   > Resende ---05/31/2016 10:05:48 PM---Please vote on releasing the
>   following
>   > candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.10.0-incubating !
>   >
>   > From: Luciano Resende
>   > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>   > Date: 05/31/2016 10:05 PM
>   > Subject: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)
>   > ------------------------------
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
>   version
>   > 0.10.0-incubating !
>   >
>   > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday,
>   > Wednesday 25 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are
>   cast.
>   >
>   > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating
>   > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>   >
>   > To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see
>   > http://systemml.apache.org/
>   >
>   > The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-incubating-rc2
>   > (3d5f9b11741f6d6ecc6af7cbaa1069cde32be838)
>   >
>   >
>   >
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/3d5f9b11741f6d6ecc6af7cbaa1069cde32be838
>   >
>   > The release artifacts can be found at :
>   >
>   >
>   >
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc2/
>   >
>   > The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>   > found at:
>   >
>   >
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1006/
>   >
>   >
>   > =====================================
>   > == Apache Incubator release policy ==
>   > =====================================
>   > Please find below the guide to release management during incubation:
>   > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>   >
>   > =======================================
>   > == How can I help test this release? ==
>   > =======================================
>   > If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking
>   an
>   > existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate,
>   then
>   > reporting any regressions.
>   >
>   > ================================================
>   > == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? ==
>   > ================================================
>   > -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal
>   related
>   > issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or
>   > regressions should not block this release.
>   >
>   > --
>   > Luciano Resende
>   > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>   > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>   >
>   >
>   >
>

Reply via email to