Luciano, Yes, I like the idea of the next release being SystemML 1.0. Given the significance of the version, it would be a good idea to not rush the release so that we can make this a truly great release.
Deron On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> > wrote: > > > I'm still not fully convinced that we need to drop Spark 1.x support, > > instead of supporting both 1.x and 2.x. I would appreciate if we could > > first conclude the discussion around migrating to Spark 2.0. > > > > Furthermore, I think that creating a dependency to Spark versioning would > > unnecessarily complicate our own release process. I would rather use > major > > releases as an opportunity to cleanup APIs and drop certain language > > features. And this is unlikely to coincide with Spark's releases. From my > > perspective it would be even more confusing for a user to release a major > > version for a relatively minor change as support for a new Spark version. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > > I will leave the discussion about Spark 1.x and 2.x for the original > thread. > > Trying to bring the topic back to the original subject, are we in consensus > that we could call the next release it SystemML 1.0 ? > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
