just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open issues
are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be able
to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a new RC
over the weekend.

Regards,
Matthias



From:   Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To:     "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
            <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Date:   09/29/2016 05:31 PM
Subject:        Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)



SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support Matthias
added he reverted changes)

-Arvind

      From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com" <dusenberr...@gmail.com>
 To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for vector
DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.

--

Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry

Sent from my iPhone.


> On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
>>
>> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
>> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we want
to
>> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
> Great progress !!!
>
> Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I will
work
> on RC2.
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/


Reply via email to