Okay I've been testing the release candidate on a large-scale problem, and I'm currently running into a "java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException" in the SparseBlockMCSR that I do not believe was present previously. I'm currently investigating, and will post again soon.
On another note, I successfully ran all of the Python tests on both Python 2.7 and 3.5. -Mike -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Oct 19, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Glenn Weidner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes - that is correct for test cases involving ID column for > DataFrameVectorFrameConversionTest, DataFrameVectorScriptTest, MLContextTest. > The four failures for MLContextFrameTest were slightly different and involve > similar fix as done for FrameConverterTest under [SYSTEMML-568] where > FrameRDDConverterUtils.csvToRowRDDused to incorporate schema information when > converting to JavaRDD<Row>. > > Thanks, > Glenn > > Matthias Boehm ---10/19/2016 12:36:04 PM---Glenn, all these issues were only > caused by wrong tests that used an invalid ID schema or populated > > From: Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 10/19/2016 12:36 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3) > > > > > Glenn, all these issues were only caused by wrong tests that used an > invalid ID schema or populated this column incorrectly, right? If so, > then I think it's fine to release. However, if we touch it anyway, we > should globally change the ID schema from double to long, which is more > intuitive when created by hand. > > Regards, > Matthias > > On 10/19/2016 8:30 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > > OK, so I think it's my understanding that for the 'src' release for rc3, > > the pom is using Spark 1.4 and the test suite passes for Spark 1.4, so this > > issue being discussed regarding test cases on Spark 1.6 is not a blocker > > for this release since the 'src' release builds and all tests pass. > > > > If this is not correct, could someone please correct me? > > > > Deron > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> if tests are consistently failing, then we should cancel the RC and either > >> fix the test or mark it as @ignored. > >> > >> Intermittent fails might be ok, but it's a community decision. > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Deron Eriksson <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I believe that for an Apache release, our test suite is supposed to pass > >>> (although I'm pretty sure random test fails can be ignored). > >>> > >>> See 2.1 of Release Check List here: > >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list > >>> > >>> "2.1 Build is successful including automated tests. > >>> The expanded source archive is expected to build and pass tests." > >>> > >>> Luciano, do you happen to know if some test failures are acceptable since > >>> our test suite is so enormous (6300+ tests)? > >>> > >>> Deron > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Glenn Weidner <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> It's a nice-to-have but not a release blocker. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Glenn > >>>> > >>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---10/18/2016 05:38:26 > >>>> PM---Glenn: Would you prefer to have https://github.com/apache/] > >> Niketan > >>>> Pansare---10/18/2016 05:38:26 PM---Glenn: Would you prefer to have > >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/269 in 0.11 releas > >>>> > >>>> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Date: 10/18/2016 05:38 PM > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3) > >>>> ------------------------------ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Glenn: Would you prefer to have > >>>> *https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/269* > >>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/269> in 0.11 > >> release > >>> ? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Niketan Pansare > >>>> IBM Almaden Research Center > >>>> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com > >>>> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php? > >> person=us-npansar* > >>>> <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php? > >> person=us-npansar> > >>>> > >>>> Luciano Resende ---10/17/2016 09:06:30 PM---Please note the minor > >>>> correction on the RC tag name (the actual tag hash is correct): > >>>> > >>>> From: Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Date: 10/17/2016 09:06 PM > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3) > >>>> ------------------------------ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Please note the minor correction on the RC tag name (the actual tag > >> hash > >>> is > >>>> correct): > >>>> > >>>> The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc3 ( > >>>> 1baebfde400134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> And off course, my +1 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Luciano Resende < > >> [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > >>>>> version 0.11.0-incubating ! > >>>>> > >>>>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > >>>>> least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > >>>>> > >>>>> To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see > >>>>> *http://systemml.apache.org/* <http://systemml.apache.org/> > >>>>> > >>>>> The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc1 ( > >>>>> 1baebfde400134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3) > >>>>> > >>>>> *https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/1baebfde40* > >>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/1baebfde40> > >>>>> 0134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3 > >>>>> > >>>>> The release artifacts can be found at : > >>>>> > >>>>> *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0* > >>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0>. > >>>>> 11.0-incubating-rc3/ > >>>>> > >>>>> The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can > >> be > >>>>> found at: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> orgapachesystemml-1009/* > >>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> orgapachesystemml-1009/> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ===================================== > >>>>> == Apache Incubator release policy == > >>>>> ===================================== > >>>>> Please find below the guide to release management during incubation: > >>>>> *http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html* > >>>> <http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html> > >>>>> > >>>>> ======================================= > >>>>> == How can I help test this release? == > >>>>> ======================================= > >>>>> If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by > >> taking > >>>> an > >>>>> existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, > >>>> then > >>>>> reporting any regressions. > >>>>> > >>>>> ================================================ > >>>>> == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == > >>>>> ================================================ > >>>>> -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal > >>>>> related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor > >>>> bugs > >>>>> or regressions should not block this release. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Luciano Resende > >>>> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975> > >>>> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Luciano Resende > >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >> > > > > > >
