+1 successfully ran python tests.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Niketan Pansare <npan...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > +1 > > > On Jan 31, 2017, at 6:02 PM, dusenberr...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > -- > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > >> On Jan 31, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Berthold Reinwald <reinw...@us.ibm.com> > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Regards, > >> Berthold Reinwald > >> IBM Almaden Research Center > >> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 > >> e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS > >> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > >> Date: 01/31/2017 08:55 AM > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2) > >> > >> > >> > >> Yes (used same data as in > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/ > master/src/main/python/tests > >> ). > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Glenn > >> > >> > >> Berthold Reinwald---01/31/2017 08:36:24 AM---Thanks, Glenn. Did you run > >> LinearRegression, etc. in the Python Notebook? Regards, > >> > >> From: Berthold Reinwald/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > >> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > >> Date: 01/31/2017 08:36 AM > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2) > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, Glenn. Did you run LinearRegression, etc. in the Python > Notebook? > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Berthold Reinwald > >> IBM Almaden Research Center > >> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 > >> e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS > >> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > >> Date: 01/28/2017 11:55 AM > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2) > >> > >> > >> > >> Verified python artifact functionality in python 2.7 notebook with new > >> spark 1.6 instance via: > >> > >> !pip install > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > 12.0-incubating-rc2/systemml-0.12.0-incubating-python.tgz > >> > >> > >> > >> Successfully ran LinearRegression, LogisticRegression, NaiveBayes, SVM. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Glenn > >> > >> Glenn Weidner---01/27/2017 05:46:55 PM---Thank you Matthias! I > definitely > >> agree with bringing the S, M, L scenarios to within a few days. > >> > >> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS > >> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > >> Date: 01/27/2017 05:46 PM > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2) > >> > >> > >> > >> Thank you Matthias! I definitely agree with bringing the S, M, L > scenarios > >> > >> to within a few days. > >> > >> Yes, for m-svm, the classes argument was default of 150 whereas maxiter > >> was set to 3 (instead of 20). I ran tests with both 0.11 and 0.12 > RC1/RC2 > >> on same cluster for comparison and will share results separately. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Glenn > >> > >> > >> Matthias Boehm ---01/27/2017 03:45:47 PM---Thanks Glenn. Could you > please > >> also share the measurements (maybe in a jira). > >> > >> From: Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> > >> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > >> Date: 01/27/2017 03:45 PM > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2) > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks Glenn. Could you please also share the measurements (maybe in a > >> jira). > >> > >> Furthermore, seeing that you ran only a subset of multinomial > >> experiments, makes me wonder if you used the current default > >> configuration of 150 classes? In the recent past, we usually ran this > >> perftest with a reasonable number of about 20 which significantly > >> impacts performance because broadcast constraints are exceeded. Given > >> the goal of a fast release process, we might want to update the perftest > >> to bring scenarions S, M, and L to something like 2 days. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Matthias > >> > >>> On 1/28/2017 12:10 AM, Glenn Weidner wrote: > >>> Successfully completed performance testing including medium and large > >> data > >>> sets for Binomial, Clustering, Multinomial (subset), Regression, and > >>> Statistics tests. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Glenn > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Arvind Surve <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > >>> To: Dev <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> > >>> Date: 01/26/2017 02:50 PM > >>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > >>> version 0.12.0-incubating ! > >>> > >>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > >>> least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > >>> > >>> To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see > >> http://systemml.apache.org/ > >>> > >>> The tag to be voted on is v0.12.0-incubating-rc2 > >>> (d96a17f64cef7f251d9592679ecdee7ac17feb04) > >>> > >>> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/ > d96a17f64cef7f251d9592679ecdee7ac17feb04 > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> The release artifacts can be found at : > >>> > >>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > 12.0-incubating-rc2/ > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can > >>> be found at: > >>> > >>> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachesystemml-1013/ > >>> > >>> ===================================== > >>> == Apache Incubator release policy == > >>> ===================================== > >>> Please find below the guide to release management during incubation: > >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > >>> > >>> ======================================= > >>> == How can I help test this release? == > >>> ======================================= > >>> If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking > >>> an existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release > candidate, > >>> then > >>> reporting any regressions. > >>> > >>> ================================================ > >>> == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == > >>> ================================================ > >>> -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal > >>> related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor > >> bugs > >>> or regressions should not block this release. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------Arvind SurveSpark Technology CenterSpark Technology > >>> Center > >>> > >>> | > >>> | > >>> | > >>> | | | > >>> > >>> | > >>> > >>> | > >>> | > >>> | | > >>> Spark Technology Center > >>> The Best Thinking On Apache Spark™ | | > >>> > >>> | > >>> > >>> | > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
