thanks for the new RC Arvind. Just as a quick update: meanwhile Imran has
caught SYSTEMML-1467 but there is a workaround, so let's keep it open and
collect some additional input from more people trying out the RC.

Regards,
Matthias

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Arvind Surve <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
> version 0.14.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see http://systemml.apache.
> org/
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.14.0-incubating-rc2 (
> 16245f3b2001695fd596a20ddab5f4fb6c43dae3)
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/
> 16245f3b2001695fd596a20ddab5f4fb6c43dae3
>
> The release artifacts can be found at :
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 14.0-incubating-rc2/
>
> The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can
> be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachesystemml-1019/org/apache/systemml/systemml/0.14.0-incubating/
>
> =====================================
> == Apache Incubator release policy ==
> =====================================
> Please find below the guide to release management during incubation:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> =======================================
> == How can I help test this release? ==
> =======================================
> If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking
> an existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate,
> then
> reporting any regressions.
>
> ================================================
> == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? ==
> ================================================
> -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal
> related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs
> or regressions should not block this release.
>  -Arvind Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center  | http://www.spark.tc/

Reply via email to