> we should create a 0.14 branch along with it to unblock ongoing > development
+1 > On Apr 15, 2017, at 9:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I think SYSTEMML-1518 and SYSTEMML-1520 require a new RC and I agree that > we should create a 0.14 branch along with it to unblock ongoing > development. I'm happy to backport any additional fixes into this branch > until we have a solid release candidate. > > Regards, > Matthias > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Arvind Surve <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML >> version 0.14.0-incubating ! >> >> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >> least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >> To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see http://systemml.apache. >> org/ >> >> The tag to be voted on is v0.14.0-incubating-rc3 ( >> fe6d887420143277aa8930cbea6d43a460ae7789) >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/ >> fe6d887420143277aa8930cbea6d43a460ae7789 >> >> >> The release artifacts can be found at : >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. >> 14.0-incubating-rc3/ >> >> The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can >> be found at: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapachesystemml-1020/org/apache/systemml/systemml/0.14.0-incubating/ >> >> ===================================== >> == Apache Incubator release policy == >> ===================================== >> Please find below the guide to release management during incubation: >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >> >> ======================================= >> == How can I help test this release? == >> ======================================= >> If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking >> an existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, >> then >> reporting any regressions. >> >> ================================================ >> == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == >> ================================================ >> -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal >> related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs >> or regressions should not block this release. >> -Arvind Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark.tc/