Thank you guys for the quick reply! Cheers, Hyunsik
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > It looks good to me. :) > > Cheers > Jaehwa > 2014. 10. 23. 오후 4:36에 "Jinho Kim" <[email protected]>님이 작성: > >> Big+1 for ZCR features >> >> >> -Jinho >> Best regards >> >> 2014-10-23 16:29 GMT+09:00 Min Zhou <[email protected]>: >> >> > +1 for the proposal. >> > >> > >> > Regards, >> > Min >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Some recent Hadoop API changes like HDFS-4953 provide nice new >> > > features for I/O intensive processing. We need these features for >> > > improving performances. But, the current Tajo supports Hadoop 2.2.0 or >> > > its higher. Probably, it is hard to keep the compatibility against >> > > 2.2.0 and make good use of new features at the same time. This is >> > > because there are many broken API changes between 2.2.0 and its >> > > higher. >> > > >> > > So, I'd like to propose that Tajo 0.9.1 abandons Hadoop 2.2.0 >> > > compatibility, and then we need to adopt newly added HDFS features. >> > > >> > > How do you guys think about it? >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > Hyunsik >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > My research interests are distributed systems, parallel computing and >> > bytecode based virtual machine. >> > >> > My profile: >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/coderplay >> > My blog: >> > http://coderplay.javaeye.com >> > >>
