+1 for release branch. As you know, we should improve the stability of the fault tolerance mechanism
-Jinho Best regards 2015-01-28 11:23 GMT+09:00 Jihoon Son <[email protected]>: > It sounds good. > In my opinion, specifically for the stability issue, we should concentrate > on those issues to release the version 0.11 as soon as possible. > > Cheers, > Jihoon > > 2015-01-28 5:02 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > > > Hi folks, > > > > There are few issues in 0.10 release. For 0.10 release, features were > > already frozen, and there are no more issues to be added to 0.10. They > > will take only one week or a little more. > > > > Besides 0.10 release, we continue to move forward to next version. So, > > I proposal 0.10 branch creation. Separating branches will let us to > > proceed next release without considering the 0.10 release. > > > > In addition, we need to discussion 0.11 roadmap. So far, Tajo has been > > changed rapidly and has many breaking changes frequently. So, I think > > that we should have a period to stable Tajo. So, instead of adding new > > features and having breaking changes, I propose that we refactor Tajo > > and refine essential features for next release. > > > > I'm looking forward to hear your opinions. > > > > Best regards, > > Hyunsik > > >
