I also agree with jinho's opinion :) 2015-05-26 12:17 GMT+09:00 Jinho Kim <[email protected]>:
> Hi Guys, > > In my opinion, we should fix TAJO-1621, TAJO-1619 in branch-0.10.1. > How do you think about that? > > -Jinho > Best regards > > 2015-05-26 9:09 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I have created an Apache Tajo 0.10.1 release candidate (rc1). > > > > This is a minor release which fixes some bugs that we've fixed after > > 0.10.0 release. > > > > The RC1 is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tajo/tajo-0.10.1-rc1/ > > > > > > Nexus Staging URL: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetajo-1005/ > > > > > > The RC1 tag in git is here: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tajo.git;a=commit;h=624c185cebd5de5be44fb9e8ba321a776361fca2 > > > > Release notes is at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tajo/tajo-0.10.1-rc1/relnotes.html > > > > > > and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can > > currently be found at: http://people.apache.org/keys/group/tajo.asc > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > Please vote: > > > > [ ] +1 release the RC1 as tajo-0.10.1 > > [ ] + 0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 do not release this package because ... > > > > Here is my +1. > > > > Best regards, > > Hyunsik Choi > > >
