[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13802633#comment-13802633
 ] 

Jihoon Son commented on TAJO-275:
---------------------------------

This is a nice work.
But, how about distinguish QueryMaster and TaskRunner roles in the java 
implementation, too?
Due to the inconsistency of supported modes in the java and C++, the 
configuration looks little complex.

> Separating QueryMaster and TaskRunner roles in worker
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-275
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-275
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Keuntae Park
>            Assignee: Keuntae Park
>         Attachments: TAJO-275.patch
>
>
> In C++ implementation of Tajo worker,
> I think it is better to maintain Java code of QueryMaster and implement only 
> TaskRunner as C++ code, rather than implementing both QueryMaster and 
> TaskRunner as C++ code.
> Accordingly, standby mode worker will have following 3 modes:
> 1) TaskRunner + QueryMaster (current implementation)
> 2) TaskRunner only (C++)
> 3) QueryMaster only (java)
> As a result,  most workers work as C++ TaskRunner, and 1 or 2 workers work as 
> separate QueryMasters (java process).
> For backward compatibility, default mode should be mode 1 (TaskRunner + 
> QueryMaster) 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to