Many projects jump according to their maturities. For example, Giraph has had two releases: 0.1 and 1.0, and Drill already released 1.0-M1 as the first release.
If we keep the current development progress, it is expected that we can announce GA of Tajo in the early next year. So, the version jump looks reasonable for me. Actually, Tajo has been developed since 2010. In some aspects, 0.2 is too low. However, this release was already fixed to 0.2. So, if other guys agree, the next version could have higher version close to 1.0. - hyunsik On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> wrote: > Keuntae > > You have a point, but I think that the version 0.2 is appropriate for the > FIRST release. > How about other guys? > > Jihoon > > 2013/10/23 ktpark <[email protected]> > >> I agree with you and I think current version number (0.2) is too low to >> appeal the maturity of Tajo :) >> How about raise the version number more for general availability? >> >> And, window functions will be greatly helpful in boosting Tajo usage in my >> company. >> >> 2013. 10. 23., 오후 12:21, Jinho Kim <[email protected]> 작성: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > I agree with us and we need to bump up the version of hadoop 2.2.0 GA >> > >> > --Jinho >> > Best regards >> > >> > >> > 2013/10/23 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >> > >> >> +1 >> >> Since Tajo also aims at one of Hadoop eco-systems, HCatalog is also >> >> very important. Actually, I'm looking forward to this feature. >> >> >> >> - hyunsik >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:36 AM, JaeHwa Jung <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hyunsik. >> >>> >> >>> I also agree with you. >> >>> >> >>> And I think that HCatalogInterface is very important feature. >> >>> I'm expecting lots of hive users to use Tajo easily with it. >> >>> >> >>> I already began to work for it, >> >>> and the JIRA issue about it is as follows: >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-16. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Hyunsik >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2013/10/23 Jihoon Son <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>>> Hyunsik, >> >>>> >> >>>> I totally agree with you. >> >>>> "CREATE TABLE ... PARTITION BY" will be very useful for uses. >> >>>> >> >>>> Also, it is important to support group by extensions (GROUP BY CUBE, >> >> ROLL >> >>>> UP, GROUPING SETS). >> >>>> The relative issue is already created at >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-256, >> >>>> and I started some required works to support it. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Jihoon >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> 2013/10/23 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi folks, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I would like to discuss the next roadmap. There are many TODOs. We >> >>>>> need to make an priority order of features. Could you suggest higher >> >>>>> priority features? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I think "CREATE TABLE ... PARTITIONED BY" is very important feature >> >>>>> for large-scale data. Also, more SQL functions should be added to >> >>>>> Tajo. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Feel free to suggest your ideas. After this discuss, I'll write the >> >>>>> discussion result to Roadmap wiki page. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - hyunsik >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Jihoon Son >> >>>> >> >>>> Database & Information Systems Group, >> >>>> Prof. Yon Dohn Chung Lab. >> >>>> Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, >> >>>> Korea University >> >>>> 1, 5-ga, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, >> >>>> Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea >> >>>> >> >>>> Tel : +82-2-3290-3580 >> >>>> E-mail : [email protected] >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> ---------------------------- >> >>> 정재화 / [email protected] >> >>> (주)그루터 >> >>> www.gruter.com >> >>> Cloud, Search and Social >> >>> ---------------------------- >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Jihoon Son > > Database & Information Systems Group, > Prof. Yon Dohn Chung Lab. > Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, > Korea University > 1, 5-ga, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, > Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea > > Tel : +82-2-3290-3580 > E-mail : [email protected]
