[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13875873#comment-13875873
 ] 

Tajo QA commented on TAJO-475:
------------------------------

{color:red}*-1 overall.*{color}  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12623857/TAJO-475_2.patch
  against master revision ebb12b7.

    {color:green}+1 @author.{color}  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included.{color}  The patch appears to include 8 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:red}-1 javac.{color}  The patch appears to cause the build to fail.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TAJO-Build/60//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Table partition catalog recap
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-475
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-475
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: catalog
>            Reporter: Min Zhou
>            Assignee: Min Zhou
>             Fix For: 0.8-incubating
>
>         Attachments: TAJO-475_2.patch, tajo-475-v2.patch, tajo-475-v3.patch, 
> tajo-475-v4.patch, tajo-475.diff
>
>
> Query master need to know where partitions of memory cached table locate. 
> At least we need a meta table contain such information
> |partition_id|
> |partition_value|
> |ordinal_position|
> |locations|
> Any suggestion?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to