Exactly thats the case. We can even discuss removing the register method, we can do this as well in other ways... Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 29. Nov. 2014 um 12:12:
> Ok then. While register call can be optional and this facade support > pluggability and is bound to an app/context all is fine. > Le 29 nov. 2014 12:08, "Anatole Tresch" <atsti...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > No. PropertyAdapters is the manager and access point who is aware of the > > propertyAdapter instances (no s at thr end). Internally the singleton > > delegates to an spi that can is loaded from the Bootstrap. The loading > > policy of the Bootstrap can be configured, so dynamic lookup eg using CDI > > can be supported similarly as ServiceLoader in SE/ME. This mechanism is > > similar to JSR354 and has been proven to work with all kind of containers > > araound. It even can support multiple mechsnisms in paralell, eg > > ServiceLoader, CDI/atinject and something custom build... > > > > Cheers > > Anatole > > Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 29. Nov. 2014 > > um > > 11:51: > > > > > Shouldnt propertyadapters be an interface? Default would use a standzrd > > SPI > > > but you can change it (closed set, osgi etc...). > > > Le 29 nov. 2014 01:24, "Oliver B. Fischer" <o.b.fisc...@swe-blog.net> > a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > @John I think it is quite convenient to reuse these mechanisms. > > Actually > > > I > > > > think nowadays we should support the automatic detection of resources > > > (how > > > > ever we call them). This means more work and even more tests for us > but > > > our > > > > users will love it. I like the way of the FasterXML/jackson [1]: Add > it > > > to > > > > the classpath and we will use it. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson > > > > > > > > Am 29.11.14 00:51, schrieb John D. Ament: > > > > > > > >> Instead of having a PropertyAdapter, can we just ask them to > implement > > > >> java.util.function.Function<?,String> or point to a lambda > expression > > > >> that > > > >> supports it? > > > >> > > > >> I would prefer that over 2 & 3 since in most cases a string > > ctor/factory > > > >> won't work without lots of lookup logic. > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > N Oliver B. Fischer > > > > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > > > > P +49 30 44793251 > > > > M +49 178 7903538 > > > > E o.b.fisc...@swe-blog.net > > > > S oliver.b.fischer > > > > J oliver.b.fisc...@jabber.org > > > > X http://xing.to/obf > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
