we could change that over time and start e.g. with anatole. regards, gerhard
2014-11-29 20:12 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > +1 Who drives it? > Le 29 nov. 2014 20:02, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > imo we should focus on the api first. using java 8 is no guarantee to > get a > > better api. > > > > as mentioned in a previous thread, we need to re-visit the existing parts > > anyway. > > e.g. at deltaspike it was quite challenging to merge the existing > > approaches until we switched to an use-case based procedure. > > we started to write tests to reflect the different use-cases starting > with > > the most trivial one. > > that increases the test-coverage and users can have a look at those tests > > to see the usage of the different parts. > > furthermore, it ensures that more advanced use-cases won't impact simpler > > uses-cases. > > in the test-suite we use packages which follow the following format: > > [project-package].[area].uc[number]. > > the use-case numbers don't reflect the priority, however, usually the > lower > > numbers reflect the most common usages. > > > > i would prefer to try such an approach also for tamaya. it might be a bit > > more time-consuming, but we can do everything step-by-step. > > moreover, we don't start with random discussions. even if we would end up > > with almost no api-changes (which i don't expect), we would get a nice > > test-coverage at the end. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2014-11-29 11:42 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > > > > I still think api is broken (access shouldnt be static like that, maybe > > we > > > can take inspiration from jcache), default method just shows api should > > be > > > split in 2 interfaces (provider and analyzer maybe?) etc... > > > > > > If solution is commons configuration and tamaya reason is j8 then why > > > creating a new project? > > > Le 29 nov. 2014 11:32, "Anatole Tresch" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > > > Dear all > > > > > > > > I miserably failed to send you feedback on the Java 8 topic due to > the > > > f... > > > > spam checks: > > > > > > > > - in html > > > > - linked to Google Docs > > > > - as PDF > > > > - as link to the blog > > > > > > > > I now published a blog on it at: > > > > javaeeconfig.blogspot.com/2014/11/configapi-java-7-vs-java-8.html > > > > > > > > Hope you can read it ;) > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Anatole > > > > > > > > PS: Can please anybody change this spam levels here for the dev list > - > > I > > > do > > > > not want to happen such a mess once more! > > > > > > > > > >
