Why "annotations" not "annotation"? Of course if we plan to change it, we might as well keep "annot" for now;-)
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Andres Almiray <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd rather be pragmatic and use "annotations" right away. > This way we can get a feeling of the API. We can later rename it to > something that fits the behavior better based on experience. > > My policy for making breaking changes (such as package names) is: > - break as much as you can during pre 1.0 in order to evolve the API to an > stable set > - deprecate after 1.0, provide parallel names as needed. > - remove deprecations is next big release (2.0) > - rinse and repeat. > > Given that we're just getting started I'd say pick one name (my vote is on > annotations and move on to the next topic) > > Cheers, > Andres > > ------------------------------------------- > Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > http://jroller.com/aalmiray > http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > -- > What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and > those who don't. > To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think we implicitely wait for some more proposals no? > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > 2014-12-06 20:40 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > > > OK, so it's still about calling one or several packages "binding" or > > > whatever and not use an "annot*" one at all? > > > > > > There have been a couple of +1 for the longer version. It also depends > on > > > what useful packages would be, maybe better to draft this in the Wiki > > than > > > an endless thread?;-) > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> but google gives more inputs with binding than annotation; What I > > >> meant is annotation is quite neutral today. Well I think my opinion > > >> is clear now :) > > >> > > >> > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> @rmannibucau > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >> > > >> > > >> 2014-12-06 20:32 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > > >> > Jackson DataBind also calls it "annotation" > > >> > > > >> > > > http://fasterxml.github.io/jackson-databind/javadoc/2.2.0/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/annotation/package-frame.html > > >> > > > >> > Some other Jackson APIs even prefer the package name "annotate" over > > >> > "annotation" or "annotations";-) > > >> > > > >> > Werner > > >> > > > >> > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> "hibernate mapping" vs "hibernate annotation", seems the first one > > >> >> wins. Same for "jackson binding" vs "jackson annotation". Then > > theonly > > >> >> challenge is to have a good doc but I have no doubt we'll get > there. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >> @rmannibucau > > >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> 2014-12-06 20:23 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer < > > [email protected] > > >> >: > > >> >> > What do I enter into the Google search field? Tamaya config > > >> annotations > > >> >> > > > >> >> > So, having a annotations package is user and search engine > > friendly. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Oliver > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Am 06.12.14 um 20:07 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> s/majority of projects/majority of *old* projects/ which means > it > > is > > >> >> >> surely time to stop following blindly others ;) > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >> >> @rmannibucau > > >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> 2014-12-06 20:04 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> The majority of projects or standards (especially Java SE or > EE) > > >> calls > > >> >> it > > >> >> >>> "annotation". > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> With very few exceptions, plural for package names is rare to > > >> >> >>> non-existent. > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> Werner Keil | JCP Executive Committee Member, JSR 363 Co Spec > > Lead | > > >> >> >>> Eclipse UOMo Lead, Babel Language Champion | Apache Committer | > > >> >> Advisory > > >> >> >>> Board Member, DWX '15 > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> Twitter @wernerkeil | @UnitAPI | @JSR354 | @AgoravaProj | > > >> @DeviceMap | > > >> >> >>> #EclipseUOMo > > >> >> >>> | #DevOps > > >> >> >>> Skype werner.keil | Google+ gplus.to/wernerkeil > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >> >>> <[email protected]> > > >> >> >>> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > N Oliver B. Fischer > > >> >> > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > > >> >> > P +49 30 44793251 > > >> >> > M +49 178 7903538 > > >> >> > E [email protected] > > >> >> > S oliver.b.fischer > > >> >> > J [email protected] > > >> >> > X http://xing.to/obf > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >
