+1 yes, makes sense! Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]> schrieb am So., 21. Dez. 2014 um 12:21:
> I like the way the Jackson JSON processor uses annotations. You don’t > need them, but if you need them you have a bunch of annoations to take > over control. > > Am 21.12.14 um 12:09 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: > > > +1, that is what we did in Johnzon and it makes usage smooth IMO. > > Le 21 déc. 2014 12:08, "Oliver B. Fischer" <[email protected]> > a > > écrit : > > > >> @Anatole: I would like to see this working even without any annotation > by > >> matching the bean property by its name with a configuration value. > >> Annotations should be only needed if the default annotation free way is > not > >> working/is not flexible enough. > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> Bye, > >> > >> Oliver > >> > >> > >> Am 18.12.14 um 00:05 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > >> > >> -- > >> N Oliver B. Fischer > >> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > >> P +49 30 44793251 > >> M +49 178 7903538 > >> E [email protected] > >> S oliver.b.fischer > >> J [email protected] > >> X http://xing.to/obf > >> > >> > > > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > >
