I think restructuring the code is the wrong interpretation of the link. For example, you can just use the maven findbugs plugin with most normal visitors via a parent pom.
On Sun Dec 21 2014 at 12:29:19 PM Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all > This should mean 'I would never move', we are a team here, so discussion is > open ... ;) > Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> schrieb am So., 21. Dez. 2014 um > 16:53: > > > -1 I will never move anything just because of a tool (I did not have a > > look at the link). Sonar does its job as well and also includes Findbugs > > metrics. > > > > 2014-12-21 16:07 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> to support FindBugs and similar tools better, I would like to propose to > >> move all real code artefacts to a code module as suggested here: > >> > >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/findbugs-maven-plugin/ > >> examples/multi-module-config.html > >> > >> Otherwise it will be a nightmare to use the same configuration easily. > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> -- > >> N Oliver B. Fischer > >> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > >> P +49 30 44793251 > >> M +49 178 7903538 > >> E [email protected] > >> S oliver.b.fischer > >> J [email protected] > >> X http://xing.to/obf > >> > >> > > > > -- > > *Anatole Tresch* > > Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead > > Glärnischweg 10 > > CH - 8620 Wetzikon > > > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > > *Twitter: @atsticks* > > *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ > > <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* > > > > *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* > > >
