Guess it was only for common containers - and was not the purpose of my mail BTW.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-08 17:58 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > Do we really want to define constants like > ContainerFactory.JPA_CONTAINER > ContainerFactory.BVAL_CONTAINER,...?? > > Regardless if that was a string, numeric value or enum, it'll be as > restrictive as that ProjectStage in JSF or worse. > Just to name a few for some Spring container you may have a > SPRING_THIS_CONTAINER or SPRING_THAT_CONTAINER, BPM solutions had a > BPM_CONTAINER, the possibilities are endless. I wouldn't even start unless > it was something as trivial as "Web Container" vs. "Enterprise Container" > which we also find in WAR vs. EAR. Everything else is totally context- or > application specific. > > Werner > > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Tresch, Anatole < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> @Anatole I don't question everything, but as the discussions are still >> ongoing I wanted to have a clean sheet discussion about it. >> -> Easy! I just tried to summarize the main point IMO, no bad feelings. I >> think we have found a good discussion culture now, and I am happy when we >> can keep that ;) >>
