There are too many false positives imo. We have a sonar instance at ASF anyway [1]. We should just ask for enlisting us over there
LieGrue, strub [1] http://analysis.apache.org/ > On Monday, 26 January 2015, 12:49, Oliver B. Fischer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1 There were thinks reported by FindBugs we would never have seen. > There are still some things to be fixed but currently set to ignore. > > > Am 26.01.15 um 12:39 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: >> +1 to remove it >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2015-01-26 12:33 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>: >>> Dear All >>> >>> basically I like tools like FindBugs, but currently it is a pain. The > Java >>> 8 support seems to be buggy, which creates useless false positives. >>> Switching rules out is also quite cumbersome, and in most cases the > tool >>> does not give me feedback, which I would not already have from outside > my >>> IDE. Checkstyle, compared to, is much more easy. So my question is: >>> 1) Do we really need FindBugs support in our build switched on by > default? >>> 2) Do we need FindBugs at all? If the tool makes you a fool... >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Anatole Tresch* >>> Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead >>> Glärnischweg 10 >>> CH - 8620 Wetzikon >>> >>> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* >>> *Twitter: @atsticks* >>> *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ >>> <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* >>> >>> *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* > > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf >
