Why don't we just introduce a sorter API? Then ordinal would be @Order and used as default only. This would allow us to fail when there is a conflict since it is solvable on user side and shouldn't happen anyway.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-28 10:08 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> Did you read the Javadocs? It is clearly written that we sort >> 1) by ordinal >> 2) by fully qualified class name. > > Side note as I'm atm busy with a $$dayjob issue. We might additionally need > to sort via the PropertySource name. That would be important if you have 2 > PropertyFilePropertySource instances with different URLs. They should get a > well defined sorting as well. > > > After that there really should be no == in the sorting anymore, right? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >> On Tuesday, 27 January 2015, 21:26, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > -1 for failing. >> >> Did you read the Javadocs? It is clearly written that we sort >> 1) by ordinal >> 2) by fully qualified class name. >> >> So there is an order that even is not dependend on classloaders. >> >> >> >> 2015-01-27 19:52 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am just writing some unit tests. One of them adds multiple property >>> sources with the same key and the same ordinal. As we can not decide >>> which one is the right one we should throw an exception. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Oliver >>> >>> -- >>> N Oliver B. Fischer >>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >>> P +49 30 44793251 >>> M +49 178 7903538 >>> E [email protected] >>> S oliver.b.fischer >>> J [email protected] >>> X http://xing.to/obf >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Anatole Tresch* >> Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead >> Glärnischweg 10 >> CH - 8620 Wetzikon >> >> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* >> *Twitter: @atsticks* >> *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ >> <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* >> >> *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* >>
