See below
Am 20.03.15 um 11:21 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
Adding the builder to this central place would consequently mean to move
its API to the API package as well. I am fine with that. If we keep it
separate, we must have some alternate entry point. Given that the builder
module can also have logic for building other artifacts, e.g. a
PropertySource, we might create an entry point named:
ConfigBuilders
WDYT?
I am not sure if we should do it or not. I like the initial idea of a
small API and optional extensions. The advantage of an small API is that
it is easy to implement it. If we start to add to much to the API I am
afraid that it will take much more effort to provide different
impementations aside from new RuntimeException("Not implemented yet.").
Oliver
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E [email protected]
S oliver.b.fischer
J [email protected]
X http://xing.to/obf
