Hi

Le 11 avr. 2015 22:49, "Oliver B. Fischer" <[email protected]> a
écrit :
>
>     Hi guys,
>
> sorry, I know it is already late, but here are the topics from our last
hangout:
>
> - Do we need a type literal? We assume that we don't need it know.
Therefore we will remove it from the API. But we can keep it in the core
module
>

I d keep it through Type (no new API for now if you think it is not
mandatory). Will avoid a dedicated API for list and map which is quite
mandatory IMO but would be a pain as a user if dedicated.

> - Do we really need ConfigOperator and ConfigQuery? If yes, we need a
much better documentation for both to illustrate their usage
>

Not sure since we can do it through our spi IMO - too early to introduce it
even if not a blocker for me.

> - We should remove the explicit provided PropertyConverter in the
Configuration interface. Afterwards we can move the PropertyConverter to
the SPI package
>
> - It might be usefull to document the maturity of the single parts of the
API. There are two possible ways to achive this: a) via annotations and b)
via JavaDoc
>

+1 for @Experimental or equivalent cause it is easier to find in IDE,
visible in bytecode if retention is right and appears in javadoc avoiding
the need to read a long text browsing the jdoc.

> - Our documentation and how all parts of Tamaya play together. Often we
must explain the same decisions again and again
>
> Did I miss something?
>
> Bye,
>
> Oliver
>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E [email protected]
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J [email protected]
> X http://xing.to/obf
>

Reply via email to