I would also not add more as we have now. IMO it works sufficiently. I never had any issues applying patches so far...
Cheers, Anatole 2016-02-14 18:24 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > +1 > > Werner > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > While build checks any rule it is fine. All IDE will be broken at some > > point. Guess checkstyle is enough - from experience too strict rules kill > > the project more than anything else. > > Le 14 févr. 2016 17:30, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit > : > > > > > I'm an IntellIJ user, I just enable checkstyle integration and point to > > the > > > checkstyle file in whatever project I'm working on. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:28 AM P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > after reading John's comment on TAMAYA-134 I'd like to get your > > opinions > > > > on code formatters. > > > > > > > > I've worked with that plugin at work > > > > http://code.revelc.net/formatter-maven-plugin/examples.html > > > > > > > > It would allow to perform a reformat based on a certain set of > Eclipse > > > > formatting settings that are bound to the project (and checked in > > > > directly to Tamaya). > > > > > > > > To my mind this would ease the way to proposed patches since we > should > > > > not have any formatting issues because the plugin runs locally during > > > > each build. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- *Anatole Tresch* Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead Glärnischweg 10 CH - 8620 Wetzikon *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* *Twitter: @atsticks* *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
