2016-07-19 15:22 GMT+02:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > Well the question is and remains who needs a Properties reboot and how are > applications supposed to use it? > > You don't get our need I think: it is more about the composition than how it is stored.
> Other than commons config or Spring there are no real production usages out > there at the moment. > > Guess the 10* of config solution will thanks you for that. There are a lot of alternatives and what I'd want we target is the one where the storage is an implementation detail but enabling the loading of any format. Then I think you focus on how to use it which is not the central point of the proposal done by DS and CODI. This is often then delegated to the englobing framework and in tamaya it will be in extensions for now until we got enough adoption to understand what is the righ cursor IMHO. > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > In DS Configuration is just a tagging interface, but has no method > > > signature. > > > > Did you even bother to read the JavaDoc? > > > > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/deltaspike/core/api/src/main/java/org/apache/deltaspike/core/api/config/DeltaSpikeConfig.java#L33 > > > > This has absolutely nothing to do with the ConfigResolver + ConfigSource > > approach: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/deltaspike/core/api/src/main/java/org/apache/deltaspike/core/api/config/ConfigResolver.java > > > > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/deltaspike/core/api/src/main/java/org/apache/deltaspike/core/spi/config/ConfigSource.java > > > > Would you PLEASE finally stop sidetracking and get back to the original > > questions? > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > >
