> > Am 20.07.2016 um 13:10 schrieb Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > > > That's where I suggested, that the minimum an SPI must provide is the > equivalent to PropertySource and maybe PropertySourceProvider. Allowing > those extensions to still work with a future design.
Yes, there is finally something we agree on ;) I probably do care less about existing extensions than you. Any new JSR imo doens’t need to bother about existing stuff. I think we agree on this part as well, right? The main reason why I think we need an SPI is because the application otherwise has no way to plug in the stuff they need. That would be like bean-validation without custom Constraint+ConstraintValidator. Such a spec would not be worth the energy imo. LieGrue, strub
