in addition: compared to other topics in this thread it isn't even OT to talk about ds-config, because the suggested API is heavily influenced by it and we already have a reality-check for ds-config. if there is no concrete and common use-case (which isn't possible), there is no valid point against ds-config (and therefore against the suggested api) imo. general statements like "project xyz couldn't use it, but it isn't possible to provide details" don't provide any useful feedback. it should be always possible to show aspects/limitations/... in general. if it isn't possible then the project (which couldn't use it) is that special that it isn't representative for the majority and therefore it can't be a valid argument against a suggestion/api/... which should fit for most (but not all) projects out there.
regards, gerhard 2016-07-31 22:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > > Am 31.07.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > > > > Just don't communicate about DS here, this is not a DS mailing list;-) > > > > Cheers > > > I guess Gerhards point is that you permanently spread wrong information > about DeltaSpike. > Not only here, but also in JCP groups, over at microprofile.io etc. > Gerhard just wanted to get things straight. > > Maybe because you didn’t know any better. Despite we tried to explain it > to you for quite some time already. > But anyway, now you know that it works, so please stop spreading wrong > information. > > LieGrue, > strub > >
