This would be a violation of what the ASF expects. Is there a reason they need to be developed outside the ASF?
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 5:50 AM Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > IMHO we should have two extension module projects. One for additional > formats, converters/data types and so on. The second for modules support > for connecting Tamaya with other systems as Consul or etcd. Both should > be ASF repositories. > > As we said during our last hangout: New modules should be developed > outside of our ASF repositories. If they are finished we should be > included in our extension projects. > > Oliver > > Am 18.08.16 um 00:17 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > > Hi all > > > > I have put together a short overview about the current > > Tamaya Module > > s, including my personal recommendation, which modules should stay in > the > > core project and which modules may be moved into a separate repo. I also > > added s small note on the most important task, which IMO have to be done > > per module. > > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBGG7h7okdiW0wzCKa7VfuQY8BLH6q4-iIfg7FOo67A/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > J Anatole > > > > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > >
