Since we are about to miss the deadline once again - any feedback on my
proposal?

Thanks
Phil

Am 01.11.2016 um 22:14 schrieb P. Ottlinger:
> Hi,
> 
> here's my report proposal - thanks for feedback :-)
> 
> <snip>
> Tamaya
> 
> Tamaya is a highly flexible configuration solution based on a modular,
> extensible and injectable key/value based design, which should provide a
> minimal but extensible modern and functional API leveraging SE, ME and EE
> environments.
> 
> Tamaya has been incubating since 2014-11-14.
> 
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> 
>  1. Extend Community
>  2. Improve Documentation and release base components
>  3. Stabilize Jenkins/CI jobs
> 
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware
> of?
> 
>  See following sections.
> 
> How has the community developed since the last report?
> 
>  We have increasing feedback of use cases to be covered and also a few
>  bug reports, so Tamaya is used by developers and companies.
>  Additionally we are doing regular bi-weekly hangouts and have defined a
>  well defined roadmap to release and restructure our project.
>  Apart from that we gathered feedback from JavaOne 2016: official
> Configuration JSR proposal and Anatole had a talk there.
> 
>  The conflicts that arose in the past seem to be solved as some of the
> mentors and early committers have left the project. Since we've
> established our hangouts we have the feeling of beeing more connect and
> able to work towards a common goal.
> 
> How has the project developed since the last report?
> 
>  Apart from the main project we established new repositories to hold
> extensions and sandbox modules. In order to get rid of the problematic
> webpage generation we decided to start from scratch.
> In addition to making the API more smooth, we try to keep the base
> repository/project as lean as possible and prepare a next release.
> Due to various technical issues (infrastructure behaves differently from
> local builds and checkouts) we did not meet our deadline on getting a
> release out by the end of October.
> 
> Date of last release:
> 
>  2016-04-06
> 
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> 
>  Phil Ottlinger at 2016-04-24.
> </snip>
> 
> 
> Phil
> 
> Am 01.11.2016 um 01:00 schrieb [email protected]:
>> Dear podling,
>>
>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
>> prepare your quarterly board report.
>>
>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 November 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
>> submission (Wed, November 02).
>>
>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
>> meeting.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>
>> Submitting your Report
>>
>> ----------------------
>>
>> Your report should contain the following:
>>
>> *   Your project name
>> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>>     the project or necessarily of its field
>> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>>     towards graduation.
>> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>>     aware of
>> *   How has the community developed since the last report
>> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
>>
>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016
>>
>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
>> this page is created from a template.
> 
> 

Reply via email to