+1 At least a 0.3-incubation based on the new structure should also run on Java 7. Given Java EE 7 isn't even fully spread across the industry yet, and EE 8 not to come out before a year from now, I would not rush things here. In case a future config standard found Tamaya an appropriate RI, then, since that standard contributes to Java EE 8 a switch to Java SE 8 only would certainly make sense. Until then I think we should at least release once or twice in a backward-compatible way.
Werner On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 I would even publish another stable release before switching to Java 8, > so the current feature set is also usable with Java 7 legacy code. > > 2016-11-10 6:56 GMT+01:00 P. Ottlinger <[email protected]>: > > > Hi, > > > > Am 09.11.2016 um 09:42 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer: > > > Ok, I assume we can go to version 8. It will solve also the doclint > > > problem mentioned by John in his last commit. > > > > I'd prefer to stabilize the builds before adding any new features ... > > > > Phil > > > > > > -- > *Anatole Tresch* > PPMC Member Apache Tamaya > JCP Star Spec Lead > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> * > *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf* >
