Among other monitoring solutions I'll mention Incubating Apache Sirona at Big Data next week, but compared to the Tamaya Jenkins its CI sessions do not look so good: https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Sirona/ A Windows build that's been failing for many months. One branch/build job looks OK, but the commit activity is generally quite low. Maybe I can point some people to it in order to help improve that?;-)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > Well they also show how it works based on what's out right now. If 0.3 > Snapshot is not so stable yet, it may be the prior one, but so far it has > not been just slides. I won't have as much time as e.g. Anatole in his > session because of a joint session with Dmitry, but since there is no > actual JSR filed at this point, that's all the live demo there is;-) > > The only Jenkins build I see failing is Tamaya-site: https://builds. > apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Tamaya/ > Maybe it's better to deactivate it, if replaced by a JBake site soon? The > other builds look fairly good, Extensions has test failures, but well, that > happens, especially if it's an extension module, if the "core" is stable > and build works, I would not say it makes a bad impression. > > Werner > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:18 PM, P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Am 10.11.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Werner Keil: >> > Well there are at least 2 occasions of "going public" or talking about >> > Tamaya next week one as part of a wider Config session I have with >> Dmitry >> > at Java2Days, the other is Anatole at ApacheCon Europe on Tamaya. >> >> To my mind it's quite "hard" to go public with constantly failing builds >> and a deprecated/old website .... but I assume that the talks are much >> more introductory and will raise attention instead of working on the >> code directly. >> >> Phil >> > >
