[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15847627#comment-15847627
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on TAMAYA-234:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 36eaf43d45d149f0d152eec28f292c4caf0525e4 in incubator-tamaya-sandbox's
branch refs/heads/master from [~wkeil]
[
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya-sandbox.git;h=36eaf43
]
TAMAYA-234: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-234
> Which JSR 363 implementations to use?
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAMAYA-234
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-234
> Project: Tamaya
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Sandbox
> Reporter: Werner Keil
> Assignee: Werner Keil
> Labels: implementations, question
> Fix For: 0.3-incubating
>
>
> There are at least 2 major JSR 363 implementations at the moment.
> - The Reference Implementation (supports Java SE 7 and ME 8 Embedded)
> - UoM-SE (supports Java SE 8 and above)
> As long as Tamaya core supports both Java SE 7 and 8 or above, I guess I'll
> focus on the RI for now. Where modules only use the API to communicate, it
> should matter very little. In some cases e.g. {BigDecimal} support or
> similar, a variation may be necessary, or implementation-specific sub-modules
> to tamaya-uom.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
