OK from my side ;) Go ahead... 2017-05-05 12:35 GMT+02:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>:
> @Anatole: I would remove the binary distribution if you don't object.? > > > Am 03.05.17 um 21:53 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer: > >> As we don't have a server or something similar at the moment I realy >> would like to drop the binary distribution. It would make the release >> prozess much easier. >> >> WDYT? >> >> >> Am 03.05.17 um 12:52 schrieb John D. Ament: >> >>> Most maven projects I've seen provide two things: >>> >>> - The source distribution of the actual source code required to build the >>> projects. >>> - A link to a maven staging repository with artifacts staged to verify >>> the >>> binary output as well. >>> >>> When I look at what Tamaya's done, its a library publishing a binary >>> release that wraps all of its JARs together. This is not overly useful. >>> The maven central distribution is enough. >>> >>> Where I do see it useful is something like a standalone server. In the >>> cases of ActiveMQ, Kafka,Cassandra their binary releases make sense since >>> it is something standalone a user can run. >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:08 AM Oliver B. Fischer < >>> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >> > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > > -- *Anatole Tresch* PPMC Member Apache Tamaya JCP Star Spec Lead *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> * *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf* [image: GeeCON] [image: JSD_Speaker_2017]
