I think the argument against it was that the SVN repository's history can tell you everything you need to know about who has changed the code. And, it's more accurate than @author tags, because those have to be maintained by whoever is making changes. I like @author tags, too, but I could take 'em or leave 'em.
-----Original Message----- From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 10:58 AM To: Tapestry development Subject: Re: Author tags We've had discussions of this before. I believe the end result was that we liked author tags! I know I do. On 5/7/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Please don't flame me on this one. > > I've seen numerous threads on the Apache lists about author tags and > their discouraged use. Would it be worthwhile in the future to remove > existing tags as we change code, as well as not putting them in new code? > > Please read the first line of the body of this message before > responding. :-) > > Brian > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFEXsC3aCoPKRow/gARAlHbAKDf6FEiobOtkE+FlBHDwq5bkLRQUACfeW9S > JMm1S/cQ8OCQY4AxOtZ3D3M= > =SZoZ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
