Yeah 4.1 should just be 4.0 ++, hopefully with ++ meaning very backwards compatible.
I have removed (not all) a good portion of interfaces/etc that were marked for removal in 4.1 though. It's impossible for me to guess whether things will still work or not but you can always give it a try and see? I've been using 4.1 in eclipse for so long now my views on how easy it is are probably invalid since my setup supports everything it wants already ;) I should note that I've been using eclipse 3.2 almost exclusively, but everything is mostly easy so far. I'm not sure I follow you in regard to compatibility with 4.0 or others but most of the new functionality is optionally used . There will have to be a new .page/.jwc dtd and .script dtd published to handle the additional changes. (Or modified? Not sure what the versioning path should be on dtds) On 6/4/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thing is I have not even started looking at 4.1 yet and to do so now would be a step backward for me. Correct me if I'm wrong but 4.1 is 4.0 plus extra goodness right? (I suspect the render story is different in 4.1 but that doesn't matter to me) I need to get the 4.0 stuff out the door so that the basic functionality can be proven. Can't do that until there is a Contrib that Spindle 4T4 can process. Thus, 4.0.3 is not optional for me. After that, and added annotation support, I can modify to add extra 4.1 goodness. Although, if 4.1 mandates the use of some T4 "features" that Spindle 4T4 can't handle , in a Library *shipped* wth 4.1, then point is moot because I won't be porting anyways. In this case support will be for 4.0 only until 5.0 comes out. BTW how much jumping around and tweaking is needed to compile 4.1 in Eclipse out of the (svn) box? The build story for 4.0 is a pain in the ass. Geoff On 6/4/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a 4.0 branch, but the current tapestry4 trunk has all of the > 4.1changes in it. > > I think it is preferrable to not release anymore 4.0 series versions if we > can get away with it, but if it ~has~ to be done can you make sure the > changes get into trunk as well? > > On 6/4/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Where is 4.0.3 in the repo? I've finally narrowsed down the parts of > > Contrib that need to be tweaked to be passed through the new Spindle > > 4T4 core without error. > > > > BTW is looks like only 3 changes. > > > > Geoff > > > > -- > > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net > > Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman > > Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Jesse Kuhnert > Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer > > Open source based consulting work centered around > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. > > -- The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
