To support Jesse here, I'm also a TestNG believer. It contains a huge number of features, well beyong Junit, and it's well though out and has reasonable IDE plugins. It also supports JDK 1.4 if you like, via an xdoclet kind of approach.
On 6/23/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think to me the question is more what is the benefit of Junit over TestNG? I've been creating annotation/configuration driven tests for a very long time now with TestNG. Junit4 is going to have to do a lot better than copying one (and not even a full copy!) feature to win me over. They also aren't supported in maven2 as far as I know...Plus I kind of like the testng engineers now :) Who knows, maybe the agility(snicker) of the junit engineers will surprise us all in the next few months but I doubt it.. On 6/23/06, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/17/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As long as we're on the subject, I should warn everyone that I also > > plan/would like to change our unit tests to use TestNG as well. It's the > > Just asking - regarding Tap, what's the benefit of TestNG over Junit 4.x ? > > Kalle > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
