[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-994?page=comments#action_12418095 ]
Jesse Kuhnert commented on TAPESTRY-994: ---------------------------------------- Sounds reasonable to me. > component types unnecessary for annotations > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: TAPESTRY-994 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-994 > Project: Tapestry > Type: Improvement > Components: Annotations > Versions: 4.0.2 > Reporter: Brian Ross > Assignee: Jesse Kuhnert > Priority: Minor > > Why do I have to type @Component(type = "TextField") when the return type of > the abstract method below it is TextField? Can't this be inferred? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
