I should probably add a new documentation page to the site today to address
these questions. I've been getting enough of them that it will be easier for
me to just do it once. I'll do this later today.

The gist of it is that this release replaces all of the "infrastructure"
work tacos does, but not necessarily the components themselves. (Except
maybe the Autocomplete/DatePicker).

For instance, the "AjaxEventSubmit" component has now been replaced with the
@EventListener annotation. They both do the same thing (more or less), with
the EventListener being much more usable and friendly than the former.
(imho).

I haven't added "effects" or the "AjaxDirectLink" sort of functionality yet
either.

If people wanted a wholesale replacement of tacos it may be best to stick
with tacos for the time being. It's unclear when a 4.1 compatible version of
it would be available, but unless people are looking for very specific "drop
in" components they may not need to wait.

On 7/3/06, Mark Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jesse,

I am interested in jumping on the bleeding edge. Can you give us a quick
idea of what new or modified functionality we will get in going from 4.0to
4.1 at this point (I know it incorporates Dojo and makes some
infrastructure
changes to better support AJAX, but that is a little vague).

Also, you mentioned "I'm sure tacos is totally fu-$%ed, but that probably
won't take very long to fix." So does that mean if we want to start
playing
around with tacos, we should stay with 4.0 until there is a new snapshot
of
tacos for 4.1? Or is there tacos-like functionality in 4.1?

Thanks for any clarification you can provide.

-- Mark R

On 7/2/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok. 4.1 is "out" now. At least in snapshot form. With no
> documentation...heh.. So, it's out for the few bleeding edge type people
> at
> least.
>
> I'll be updating documentation more and more indefinitely, saving
> component
> docs until something gets figured out with tapdoc.
>
> On 7/2/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, you were unlucky in timing, sorry about that. The event stuff
(aka
> > implementing form state management on client side) is in subversion
head
> now
> > so what you were trying to do would probably work great now.
> >
> > I have a few unit tests to fix before deploying a new snapshot but
will
> do
> > it one at some point today. (not because it's broken, just new
> unexpected
> > easymock method calls)
> >
> >
> > On 7/2/06, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 11:38:12 -0400, Norbert Sándor <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > How compatible are the 4.0 and 4.1 versions?
> > > > Can I just replace the 4.0 jars with the 4.1 ones?
> > >
> > > I gave 4.1 a whirl and ultimately had to go back to 4.0.2 for the
time
> > > being.  The form event stuff still needs some TLC.  Additionally,
note
> > > that a lot of things (all?) that were deprecated in 4.0 are removed
in
> > > 4.1.  So, if you still use the Visit object, for example, that's no
> > > longer
> > > there.
> > >
> > > All in all, it's not a bad upgrade, but I don't think it's as simple
> as
> > > dropping in the new JARs.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kuhnert
> > Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer
> >
> > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
>
>




--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.

Reply via email to