I'm glad I brought it up! Breaking For is enough of a reason to revert these
changes for me.
On 7/24/06, Mind Bridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great idea... I find the action more intuitive to use than the
listener. I
> don't know any case where I would need a listener instead of an action.
I would suggest checking out the list archives where this issue has been
discussed multiple times.
Specifically, the current 'action' simply would not work within a cycle
(e.g. Submit within a For).
In addition, there are 3 types of developers:
1) Developers who have used extensively Tapestry 3 or earlier.
'listener' in T3 was not delayed, and the current approach preserves
this property ('action' is delayed, instead). This means that code
written earlier would work now as well (in many cases it would not work
if 'action' is renamed as 'listener' instead)
2) Developers who have started using Tapestry extensively around version 4
For those, 'listener' seems more logical than 'action', as many of the
examples in the documentation that they have seen still used 'listener'.
3) Developers who will start using Tapestry in the future
For those, 'action' is actually more logical, since this is the name
used in many other systems as well. In addition, if all of the examples
in the documentation use 'action', rather than 'listener', then the
question for renaming will simply not stand in this group.
In short, a renaming would only benefit group 2 at the cost of harming
groups 1 and 3.
It seems to me that the issue needs to be resolved via fixes in the
documentation (if actually needed), rather than parameter renaming.
Henri Dupre wrote:
> On 7/22/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> One of the largest quircks that I've seen come up again and again is
>> when
>> people use listener= on their submit buttons vs action=.
>>
>> Can there really be that many scenerios where a DirectLink wouldn't do
>> just
>> as well as a @Submit with listener=?
>>
>> I'd like to sneakily just drop out the current behaviour of
>> listener="" on
>> these submits(Submit/LinkSubmit/ImageSubmit) and make them all use
>> action
>> under the covers, deprecating action="" in favor of the other more
>> "consistent" naming convention.
>
>
> Great idea... I find the action more intuitive to use than the
> listener. I
> don't know any case where I would need a listener instead of an action.
>
> Henri.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
