devel - Fashion Content wrote:
> Is nestedWriter copying the content or maintaining a list to be merged?
copying the content
>
> I would like a copy of the @Shell you wrote if you dont mind :)
its in 4.1.1 as well as 2 new components... i'm currently updating the docs

>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "andyhot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 7:28 PM
> Subject: OutOfMemory in tapestry 4.0.2
>
>
>> Quoting from the user's list:
>> "I removed the @Body from the page and now the output seems to be
>> working fine.
>> The report is being outputed onfly as each component is rendered.
>> I guess the problem was really the buffer in the tag Body.
>> Thanks, Rodnei Couto"
>>
>> This worries me a bit because i've introduced another buffering layer
>> (by rendering
>> the body of the @Shell in a nested writer) so that we can capture css
>> contributions
>> (similar to how we capture js contributions).
>> I'll try to do some performance & memory tests and report the results -
>> we might need
>> a smart way to reduce memory consumption esp. on nestedWriter.close()
>>
>> I'm also not aware of @Body's history, but I was just wondering if
>> anyone had noticed
>> anything similar when Body started using buffering.
>>
>> -- 
>> Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
>> Tapestry / Tacos developer
>> Open Source / J2EE Consulting
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / J2EE Consulting 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to